31 March 2008

Atelier Lyrique

Yesterday afternoon was instalment number four of my season at the opera. This time, it was the 'Atelier Lyrique,' wherein, as I understand it, up-and-coming Montréal opera performers take their turn with the OdM (Opéra de Montréal) public. There were two one-act presentations, l'Heure espagnole from Maurice Ravel and Le Secret de Suzanne from Ermanno Wolf-Ferrari.

I attended with my friend and former office mate at a previous job and we had a delightful time.



L'Heure espagnole (The Spanish Hour) begins with the clockmaker Torquemada (Yikes! Wasn't that the name of the chief torturer of the Spanish Inquisition?!) in his shop, preparing for his weekly task of resetting all of the town's clocks. His wife, it seems, had something to do with his landing that job, and uses the weekly appointment as a time to meet her lover! Just to spoil things, a muleteer arrives, hoping to have his watch fixed, and agrees to wait until the clock maker returns.

Wait?! But what will the wife do with her lover in the presence of the muleteer? Well the muleteer comes in handy as a means to carry clock (and concealed lovers) up and down the stairs, and then finally as the better alternative between a poet who is too enamoured of his own words to move to the action craved by the clockmaker's wife and the banker who is, after all, unable to emerge from the clock in which he is hidden to get to any action of his own. And the clockmaker even manages to sell the two clocks in question to their unfortunate concealed would-be lovers! Everyone is happy, especially the wife and the muleteer, and the clockmaker is none the wiser.

Le Secret de Suzanne (Suzanne's Secret) is all about a new wife with an unfortunate habit. While her husband suspects that she is having an affair — and with a smoker, no less — it turns out that she is secretly smoking. When the secret comes out, the solution is like a dream from a tobacco company's boardroom: she doesn't need to quit, as they can smoke together!

This second one was the more enjoyable, if only for the rather lighter and livelier music and the fabulous comic acting of the guy playing the couple's maid, Santa. We killed ourselves laughing all the way through.

And my last opera of the season, Madame Butterfly, is coming up in June.

29 March 2008

Earth Hour


Okay, I'm signing up for all the hype and turning off all my lights, etc. at 8 pm for Earth Hour. I know it's only meant to be symbolic. As symbols go it will be a good and obvious one, so that's nice. I actually plan to take a little nap during that hour, so I can be sure that I really don't have any lights on, and it will probably help my body to deal with the cold I seem to have developed as well. (Question: is it cheating to nap for Earth Hour? Do I actually need to be awake and feeling the deprivation of no lights?)


The thing that really amuses me, however, is reading about how many people are planning to do things by candlelight during Earth Hour. This might seem a tad simplistic, but it strikes me that burning something for light while you turn out your low wattage compact fluorescents might not be helping the environment so much after all.


(Not that I am using those: they are toxic to dispose of!)

So is anyone else wondering what might be the environmental impact of all that candle burning tonight between 8 and 9 pm?

Just asking, that's all...

10 March 2008

Epilogue: Karma or Poetic Injustice?

This morning, when it was safe for me to go outside and not get guilt-tripped into helping my neighbour shovel out her car, I ventured forth to remove the snow from my stairs. Oh, I was very ready to leave a little patch of snow in front of the door of the neighbours I have been so annoyed with for not taking their turn at shovelling. My cackles of guilty delight (some penance that turned out to be!) soon dissolved into sobs as my evil plot was undone by physics: something about the configuration of my tiny shared front porch incites the wind to remove snow from in front of my neighbours' door and to deposit it in drifts up against mine.

Foiled!

09 March 2008

Snow and Etiquette

As we creep closer and closer to the apparent all-time record of snowfall (at least since we stole the continent and started writing these things down), I am seized by the need both to vent and to confess. Venting is way more fun, so I'll start with that.

I, like many others in Montréal, have an outdoor staircase leading to my front door which staircase I share with my upstairs neighbours. Now, it won't make a lot of sense for those who come from elsewhere that this is a city of long winding outdoor staircases, given our winter experiences, but this is apparently a product of a time when the Catholic Church was much more in control of our society. It seems that the Church thought that if staircases leading to different dwellings in this urban setting were indoors, there might be hanky-panky out of the watchful eyes of the neighbours. Keeping the staircases outside mad it much more possible for the neighbours to see, and presumably denounce, anything untoward that might be unfolding in their neighbourhoods.

For several years now, I have noticed that the parade of younger people who have occupied the apartment upstairs from me (who share my staircase) have had the unfortunate inability to wield a shovel and take their turn at clearing the snow and ice from our staircase. That delightful duty, albeit one that generally takes a maximum of 15 minutes in the very worst of conditions, keeps falling to me. They see content to walk on the snowy stairs, compressing our fluffy precipitation into hard-pack and eventually ice, while I, ever concerned about my own welfare and that of our letter-carrier, have to drag myself outside to clear the snow, chip away at the ice and deposit salt to melt what cannot be chipped away.

Now, like I said, this is not a multi-hour task, and it is probably good for me. After many years, however, I start to resent that it is the middle-aged guy with AIDS and arthritis in his hands and feet who has to clear the snow while the younger and more sprightly neighbours reap the benefits. Of course, it would be I and not they who is in greater danger of falling and breaking a hip!

Imagine my delight to arrive home the other day, after a small snowfall, to find that they seemed to have cleared the snow off the stairs, probably with their feet, judging from the quality of the snow removal (being an expert I do get fussy about these things). My delight dissolved into outrage as I reached the top of the stairs: they had cleared the snow from the stairs and from the space immediately in front of their own door, but left several centimetres of snow in front of my door! If I hadn't dutifully cleared snow from in front of their door for EVERY OTHER SNOWFALL this year, I might not have felt so outraged. What's with that?!!

Here I let my rage go and drift into the confession part of this post.

The thing that most amuses me about snowfalls in this city is what it does to personal motor vehicles. That's probably because I don't own one and don't think, in general, that people should own cars in a city with a pretty decent public transit system. Here is my neighbour's car late last night, snowstorm raging and illumination courtesy of the orangey streetlights:



Here's what it looked like this morning, with better light, but more hours of snow and wind and multiple snowplow passages on the street- and sidewalk sides of it:


You will notice that these photos were taken from the same vantage point — safely inside my apartment, looking down on the street scene outside. It seems (here comes the confession) that I can't bring myself to offer to help my neighbour (different neighbour, on the other side) to dig her car out of the snow. I even went so far, a few weeks ago, as to stay inside when I noticed that she was out there digging away to liberate her personal pollution device from the hardened snow that had been plowed up against it. And I must say that she was out there for hours while I guiltily skulked around inside, revising my plans for the day to the point where I cancelled them altogether. (There was no going outside without having to pass by the tired neighbour plugging away at her endless task.)

So why did I do that? Of course, I could justify my (in)action by the aforementioned political point of view that cars do not belong in the city. I could cave and confess that I am just lazy. I could explore my feelings for this neighbour, who has lived here since before I moved in (yikes! 15 years ago!) and had been quite pleasant with me, until I started resenting her feeling comfortable commenting about my weight gain in recent years. ("Does she think she's doing me a service, pointing out something I might not have seen, or is she just trying to make me feel good? Screw her: she can shovel her own car out!") In fact, it is probably a mixture of all of those elements.

And now, like the good Catholic that I was very briefly during the confusion of my coming-out process, I have wiped the slate clean by confessing and can start all over again. (Yeah, I am more familiar with the theology than to believe that that's how the confession thing works.)